fbpx

We are the OEA

Leading the Way for Children and Public Education

Public Education Matters icon

OEA calls for end of mandatory retention under Third Grade Reading Guarantee

OEA calls for end of mandatory retention under Third Grade Reading Guarantee

[October 10, 2022] The Ohio Education Association (OEA) joined together Monday with state leaders, educators, and education policy experts to advocate for action in the General Assembly to end mandatory retention tied to third-grade standardized testing.

A full recording of Monday’s virtual event can be viewed and downloaded here.

“Mandatory retention under the so-called ‘Third Grade Reading Guarantee’ takes decisions about students’ futures out of the hands of parents, administrators, and teachers who know them best, allowing politicians in Columbus to determine their fates based on arbitrary cut-scores on high-stakes English language arts tests,” said OEA President Scott DiMauro, who moderated Monday’s event. “OEA commends the State Board of Education for its attention to this issue as it considers a resolution to call on the General Assembly to change this misguided law.”

“Grade retention distorts test data, disproportionately impacts and punishes vulnerable populations of students, and creates a distraction from reading reform’s ultimate goal of increased student reading proficiency,” noted Furman University Professor Dr. Paul Thomas in his recent white paper, “A Critical Examination of Grade Retention as Reading Policy.”

“It’s rare that policymakers stop and measure mandated education initiatives for their effectiveness, but that’s exactly what we have done for third grade retention. Through data provided by the Ohio Department of Education, we now know retention has failed as an initiative and has, in fact, hurt children more than helped,” said Dr. Christina Collins, Ohio State Board of Education member for District 7, who put forth the resolution that the State Board of Education is considering this week.

“In my experiences as a third-grade teacher, I have observed students put tremendous stress on themselves, become discouraged, think of themselves as losers, and develop behavioral problems because of this punitive, socially inappropriate, and educationally ineffective practice,” agreed Karen Carney, a teacher at Campbell Elementary & Middle School in Campbell, Ohio. “What a huge burden for a young child to carry—this truly broke my heart. As an educator, my primary job is to teach my students to be life-long learners, not test takers.”

“Ending mandatory retention has broad bipartisan support because it’s the right thing to do for kids,” said State Rep. Gayle Manning (R-North Ridgeville), who sponsored House Bill 497, a measure to end mandatory retention under the Third Grade Reading Guarantee. “These decisions should be made by parents and educators, not dictated by a score on a test.”

House Bill 497 passed in the Ohio House in June. The Ohio Senate must take up the bill and pass it when lawmakers return to session later this fall.

Categories

2022 Press Releases
Education Support Professional
Legislative Issues and Political Action
Local Leader
New Teacher
OEA Member
Retired Member
Student Member
Teacher Evaluation

OEA members offer solutions to state’s growing teacher recruitment and retention crisis

[September 29, 2022] As Ohio continues to contend with an alarming decrease in staffing in its K-12 public schools, educators from around Ohio have come together to take on the problem and offer potential solutions. The Ohio Education Association (OEA) convened the cadre of diverse educators, as part of the National Education Association’s Educator Voice Academy (EVA) program, beginning in January, 2022. The EVA team’s full report, which includes numerous suggestions for Ohio’s elected leaders and OEA, is available here.

“Ohio’s growing teacher recruitment and retention crisis is one of the largest issues of our time,” OEA President Scott DiMauro pointed out. “When excellent educators are feeling that they have no choice but to leave the profession or young people are left feeling that teaching is not a sustainable career option – for a variety of reasons noted in the EVA’s report – Ohio students lose out on crucial opportunities and supports. Ohio’s students can no longer wait for meaningful solutions to this problem.”

Recommendations in the EVA report include:

  • Immediately increase Ohio state minimum teacher’s salary to $40,000, and pending approval of a change in OEA Legislative Policy by the OEA Representative Assembly, increase the state minimum salary to $50,000.
  • Fully fund the Fair School Funding Plan in the 2023-2025 state biennial budget and provide state support to local school districts with the resources to help fund necessary salary increases.
  • Extend Public Service Loan Forgiveness deadlines and expand student loan forgiveness, grants, and scholarship programs to provide meaningful financial relief for those who commit to serving students in our public schools.
  • Strengthen educators’ retirement security by supporting a fully funded State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio and repealing the Government Pension Offset (GPO) and Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP).
  • Remove financial barriers for completion of pre-service requirements for teacher licensure.
  • Require the state to complete a comprehensive assessment of the alignment of Ohio’s teacher preparation programs with the realities of PK-12 schools.
  • Seek feedback from educators on their working conditions and create systems for school leaders to act on that feedback to make necessary changes to policies, practices, and culture in schools.
  • Create and maintain an accessible statewide database of education job openings to facilitate the matching of educators seeking employment with available positions and to provide a reliable source of information for the public to monitor trends in education employment in Ohio.

“It is important to note that the recommendations from the Educator Voice Academy are focused exclusively on issues related to the recruitment and retention of teachers; issues related to the recruitment and retention of education support professionals, including bus drivers, cafeteria workers, and paraprofessionals, among others, is an equally important topic deserving serious consideration as soon as possible,” DiMauro said. “Ohio’s policymakers and school leaders need to take immediate, significant action to ensure our students have all their needs met so they can learn, grow, and thrive in our classrooms. The time to act is now.”

 

Categories

2022 Press Releases
Education Support Professional
Legislative Issues and Political Action
Local Leader
New Teacher
OEA Member
Retired Member
Student Member
Teacher Evaluation

OEA celebrates advocacy wins in new state report card system

[September 15, 2022] As families and education stakeholders around the state continue to examine the newly released state report card data, the Ohio Education Association (OEA) is celebrating the hard work of Ohio’s dedicated educators to support the state’s students as they continue to overcome the challenges of pandemic-era learning. Further, OEA expresses its sincere gratitude to the lawmakers who answered OEA’s calls for report card reform, resulting in the fairer assessments that were made public today.

“OEA has long fought against the overreliance on high stakes standardized tests in determining the value and success of Ohio’s public schools and students. The adoption of House Bill 82 in 2021 and other recently enacted laws that resulted in the significant changes in this year’s state report cards represent an incredibly important win in that regard,” OEA President Scott DiMauro said. “Gone are the misleading A-F grades, which gave an incomplete picture of a district’s performance at best. Gone are the draconian punishments for districts that failed to measure up to the cookie cutter standards of out-of-touch bureaucrats who clung to the report card letter grades to trigger state takeovers and wrest control from local parents and voters. Here to stay is a commitment to a more accurate and transparent assessment system for Ohio’s public schools.”

Among the trends highlighted by this accountability system, it is clear that Ohio’s traditional public schools continue to best serve the students in their communities. This year’s data demonstrates that the average achievement component score for the state’s traditional public school districts is 3.5 stars compared to the 1.7 star rating achieved, on average, by charter schools in the state on that same metric.

While more work is needed to further improve the state’s report card system, including major changes to improve accountability standards for Ohio’s charter schools and the private schools that take taxpayer-funded vouchers, OEA celebrates the move to a more informative star-rating system in this year’s report cards, complete with explanations about what the stars mean to provide the public with critical context. Further, OEA welcomes the inclusion of Student Opportunity Profiles in the 2022-2023 data that will be released next September. Those profiles will provide detailed information regarding what students have been offered to enhance their success. Academic and non-academic supports are essential for our students, especially as pandemic recovery continues.

Categories

2022 Press Releases
Education Support Professional
Legislative Issues and Political Action
Local Leader
New Teacher
OEA Member
Retired Member
Student Member
Teacher Evaluation

OEA members recommend pro-public education candidates for statewide, legislative races

[September 7, 2022] Decisions made in Ohio’s statehouse and by other elected officials impact what happens in our public-school classrooms every day. Ohio Education Association members have spent the last several months interviewing candidates in political races around the state to make recommendations about who will best serve Ohio’s students, educators, and public schools if elected to office. The full list of OEA member-recommended candidates is now available here.

Among the many recommendations made by OEA members who serve on the OEA Fund State Council and District Screening Committees, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Nan Whaley has received OEA’s recommendation. “Whaley was instrumental in the Senate Bill 5 fight in 2011, serving as a key voice in the effort to protect collective bargaining rights in Ohio. As Dayton’s mayor, she was able to implement universal pre-K across the city and championed gun safety reforms that would make our schools safer,” OEA President Scott DiMauro noted. “Ohio needs Nan Whaley as governor.”

OEA members have also voted to recommend Representative Tim Ryan for U.S. Senate and Justice Jennifer Brunner, Judge Marilyn Zayas, and Judge Terri Jamison for the Ohio Supreme Court. Other OEA member recommendations include Representative Jeff Crossman in the race for Attorney General, and Mayor Scott Schertzer in his bid for Treasurer of State.

In races for the General Assembly, OEA members are recommending several educators-turned-candidates, including State Representative Joe Miller (D-53), Sean Brennan for House District 14, and Sophia Rodriguez for House District 84. “When educators represent us in the statehouse, Ohio’s students win. These candidates know better than anyone what our students need to succeed and how lawmakers can provide meaningful support for our public schools. They also know firsthand how damaging bills dragging our schools into manufactured culture wars have already been, so their voices in the ongoing battle to ensure our students have the freedom to receive a fair and honest education will be crucial,” DiMauro said.

The decisions about who to recommend for office are made entirely based on the candidates’ views on public education issues, or in the case of an incumbent candidate, on their record regarding public education issues. Political affiliation and views on other issues are not factors in these recommendations. “OEA members know having pro-public education leaders in office is essential for the future of our public schools,” DiMauro said. “We thank all of the members who have dedicated so much of their time and energy to the candidate screening process to ensure the best pro-public education candidates receive Ohio educators’ support.”

Categories

2022 Press Releases
Legislative Issues and Political Action
Local Leader
OEA Member
Retired Member

OEA – Teacher wage gap report highlights teacher shortage cause

[August 16, 2022] As the new school year gets underway with school districts struggling to fill teacher vacancies, a new report from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) examining the “teacher wage penalty” data is shining the spotlight on one of the root issues behind Ohio’s growing educator recruitment and retention crisis: Ohio teachers are paid 14.4% less than people with similar levels of education and experience in our state.

“Ohio must do more to make teaching an attractive profession, and that starts with paying educators fairly as the skilled professionals they are,” said Ohio Education Association President Scott DiMauro. “Between the fact that you can get paid a lot more money working in another career field and the constant attacks from extremist politicians who are ignoring the will of the overwhelming majority of Ohio parents who trust their children’s teachers to do the jobs they were trained to do, it’s no surprise that we’re seeing far fewer Ohioans entering the profession than even a few years ago and we’re struggling to keep many highly qualified, experienced teachers in this career. Something has to give.”

According to the EPI report, average weekly wages of public school teachers in the United States, adjusted for inflation, increased just $29 from 1996 to 2021, while inflation-adjusted weekly wages for other college graduates rose $445 over that same period. And, even when things like health insurance and retirement plans are accounted for, the benefits advantage for teachers has not been enough to offset the growing wage penalty, which was a record-high 23.5% nationally last year.

“This report should set off huge alarm bells for policy makers at every level. We are at a tipping point,” DiMauro said. “Without significant action right now to address the pay disparities for teachers and the other major issues contributing to staffing shortages, our schools are not going to be able to maintain the workforce levels needed to deliver the world-class education every student deserves. Ohio’s families need our lawmakers to step up and invest in our public schools.”

“Ohio must make a long-term commitment to fully and fairly funding our schools and paying our educators what they deserve,” DiMauro added. “OEA calls on every Ohio lawmaker to take this EPI report to heart.”

Categories

2022 Press Releases
Local Leader
New Teacher
OEA Member

Social Links

ACTION ALERT Urge your State Representative to Oppose SB 83

RESOURCES

OEA Wellness Resources

Resources from NEA 

Read Across America

Ohio Schools Magazine digital editions

PRESS RELEASES

LEGISLATIVE WATCH RELEASES

  • September 12, 2024 – This is our chance to end GPO-WEP
  • August 23, 2024 – OEA Applauds State Controlling Board Decision to Approve Full Funding for the State Board of Education
  • August 9, 2024 – U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown Calls for Vote on Repeal of GPO/WEP
  • July 2, 2024 – Senate Bill 83 Stalls Out Before Legislative Recess; Take Action to Stop Teacher License Fee Increase; House Bill 214 – Professional Conduct Policies; Senate Bill 104 – Transgender Bathroom Restrictions Amended into CCP Bill; Senate Bill 168 – Various Education Regulation Provisions
  • Legislative Watch archive
  • Legislative Scorecard – An interactive Legislative scorecard for each member of the Ohio General Assembly

EVENTS

  • October 23 – Moving from Land Acknowledgements to Action in the Buckeye State
  • October 26-27 – Bargaining Boot Camp – Southwest (this event has reached capacity)
  • November 2-3 – Bargaining Boot Camp – Northeast (this event has reached capacity)
  • November 9-10 – Bargaining Boot Camp – Central (this event has reached capacity)
  • November 15 – Cleveland CAVs vs Chicago Bulls
  • November 18 – OEA Virtual Trivia Night
  • November 19 – OEA New President Power Hour: Advocacy and representing your members
  • November 23-24 – Bargaining Boot Camp – Northwest (this event has reached capacity)
  • December 10 – CBJ vs Philadelphia Flyers
  • December 12 – CBJ vs Washington Capitals
  • December 14 – CBJ vs Anaheim Ducks
  • January 21 – OEA New President Power Hour: Helpful tips for successful negotiations
  • January 25 – Cleveland CAVs vs Houston Rockets
  • January 25-26 – AE ONE Annual Conference
  • February 2 – Cleveland CAVs vs Dallas Mavericks
  • February 18 – OEA New President Power Hour: Best practices in communicating with your members and the community
  • February 21 – Cleveland CAVs vs New York Knicks
  • March 2 – Cleveland CAVs vs Portland Trail Blazers
  • March 18 – OEA New President Power Hour: Your voice in the OEA Democratic Structure and resources available to you and your members
  • April 15 – OEA New President Power Hour: “What If” Sharing problem-solving strategies

PUBLIC EDUCATION MATTERS PODCAST

Subscribe and Listen to Public Education Matters on a variety of podcast networks
Transistor RSS feed | Apple podcasts | Listen on YouTube | Spotify | Amazon music

Season 4
Season 3

Oh Yes, We’re Social — Join the Conversation!

Updated October 17, 2024

Categories

Education Support Professional
Higher Education Staff
Local Leader
New Teacher
OEA Member
preK-12 Teacher
Retired Member
Student Member
Uncategorized

Ohio Education Association Candidate Recommendations

Ohio’s General Election is on Tuesday, November 5, 2024. Make sure educators voices are heard this November by making your plan to vote. Please see below for some important dates and links for information on voting in the upcoming General Election.

Important Dates

  • Monday, October 7, 2024 – Deadline to register to vote and update registrations in advance of the General Election Boards of Election will be open until 9:00 PM for individuals to drop off registrations. See below links for how to check your registration status, register to vote, or update your registration online.
  • Tuesday, October 8, 2024 – Early voting for the 2024 General Election begins. See links below for in-person early voting locations, dates, and times.
  • Monday, November 4, 2024 – Absentee ballots must be postmarked by this date if returned by mail.
  • Tuesday, November 5, 2024 – General Election: Polls are open from 6:30 AM to 7:30 PM and absentee ballots may be returned by 7:30 PM to your Board of Elections if not returned by mail.

Important Links

  • To check your registration status, please click here.
  • To register or update your registration, please click here.
  • To find your county’s early voting location, please click here.
  • To find the schedule for early in-person voting, please click here.
  • To find out how to request a mail in ballot and vote by mail, please click here.

Click here to look up your current legislative district under the latest state maps.

As part of your voting plan, we urge all OEA members to check out the list of candidates recommended by the OEA members below. Many more candidate recommendations will be made after the Primary, so please continue to check for updates.

It is important to note that OEA members across the state—not OEA staff or leaders—make all the endorsement decisions. In each race, candidates from both parties are asked to fill out questionnaires describing their positions on education issues, and those who are state officeholders are also rated on their education votes in the General Assembly. Candidates are then interviewed by OEA members who work in the district or area in which candidates are seeking office. Based on the candidate’s views on public education issues—and only on public education issues—the OEA Fund State Council and District Screening Committees vote on whether to endorse specific candidates.

You can learn more about the OEA Fund and the screening process here.

**If viewing the recommended candidates list on a mobile phone or small screen, please rotate your device to a horizontal orientation for better viewing.**


 

President and Vice-President Kamala Harris (D)/Tim Walz (D)
US Senate Recommended Candidate
US Senate – OH Sherrod Brown (D)
Judicial Seat  
Associate Justice of the OH Supreme Court Melody Stewart (D)
Associate Justice of the OH Supreme Court Michael Donnelly (D)
Associate Justice of the OH Supreme Court (Unexpired Term) Lisa Forbes (D)
Ohio House Recommended Candidate
District 1 Dontavius Jarrells (D)
District 2 Latyna Humphrey (D)
District 3 Ismail Mohamed (D)
District 4 Beryl Brown Piccolantonio (D)
District 5 Meredith Lawson-Rowe (D)
District 6 Christine Cockley (D)
District 7 Allison Russo (D)
District 8 Anita Somani (D)
District 9 Munira Abdullahi (D)
District 10 Mark Sigrist (D)
District 11 Crystal Lett (D)
District 12 Brad Cotton (D)
District 13 Tristan Rader (D)
District 14 Sean Brennan (D)
District 15 Chris Glassburn (D)
District 16 Bride Rose Sweeney (D)
District 17 No Position
District 18 Juanita Brent (D)
District 19 Phil Robinson (D)
District 20 Terrence Upchurch (D)
District 21 Eric Synenberg (D)
District 22 Darnell Brewer (D)
District 23 Daniel Troy (D)
District 24 Dani Isaacsohn (D)
District 25 Cecil Thomas (D)
District 26 Sedrick Denson (D)
District 27 Rachel Baker (D)
District 28 Karen Brownlee (D)
District 29 Cindy Abrams (R)
District 30 Stefanie Hawk (D)
District 31 Bill Roemer (R)
District 32 No Position
District 33 Veronica Sims (D)
District 34 Derrick Hall (D)
District 35 Mark Curits (D)
District 36 No Position
District 37 No Position
District 38 No Position
District 39 No Position
District 40 No Position
District 41 Erika White (D)
District 42 Elgin Rogers, Jr. (D)
District 43 Michele Grim (D)
District 44 David Blythe (D)
District 45 No Position
District 46 Benjamin McCall (D)
District 47 Vanessa Cummings (D)
District 48 Scott Oelslager (R)
District 49 Krista L. Allison (D)
District 50 Matthew Kishman (R)
District 51 No Position
District 52 Gayle Manning (R)
District 53 Joe Miller (D)
District 54 No Position
District 55 Laura Davis (D)
District 56 Cleveland Canova (D)
District 57 Jamie Callender (R)
District 58 Lauren McNally (D)
District 59 No Position
District 60 Rachael Morocco (D)
District 61 David Hagan (D)
District 62 Katie Vockell (D)
District 63 No Position
District 64 Lauren Mathews (D)
District 65 No Position
District 66 No Position
District 67 No Position
District 68 No Position
District 69 Jamie Hough (D)
District 70 No Position
District 71 No Position
District 72 Nathaniel Adams (D)
District 73 No Position
District 74 No Position
District 75 Haraz Ghanbari (R)
District 76 No Position
District 77 No Position
District 78 No Position
District 79 Monica Robb Blasdel (R)
District 80 No Position
District 81 James Hoops (R)
District 82 No Position
District 83 No Position
District 84 Arienne Childrey (D)
District 85 No Position
District 86 Tracy Richardson (R)
District 87 No Position
District 88 No Position
District 89 No Position
District 90 Justin Pizzulli (R)
District 91 No Position
District 92 Mark Johnson (R)
District 93 Jason Stephens (R)
District 94 Wenda Sheard (D)
District 95 Don Jones (R)
District 96 No Position
District 97 No Position
District 98 No Position
District 99 Louis Murphy (D)
Ohio Senate Recommended Candidate
District 2 Paloma De La Fuente (D)
District 4 Thomas Cooke (D)
District 6 Willis Blackshear (D)
District 8 Louis Blessing, III (R)
District 10 Daniel McGregor (D)
District 12 No Position
District 14 Shane Marcum (D)
District 16 Beth Liston (D)
District 18 Katie O’Neill (D)
District 20 No Position
District 22 No Position
District 24 Tom Patton (D)
District 26 Mohamud Juma (D)
District 28 Casey Weinstein (D)
District 30 Iva Faber (D)
District 32 Michael Shrodek (D)
District 33 No Position
U.S. Congress Recommended Candidate
District 1 Greg Landsman (D)
District 2  
District 3 Joyce Beatty (D)
District 4  
District 5  
District 6  
District 7  
District 8  
District 9 Marcy Kaptur (D)
District 10  
District 11 Shontel Brown (D)
District 12  
District 13 Emilia Sykes (D)
District 14  
District 15 Adam Miller (D)
State Board of Education Recommended Candidate
SBOE 1 Kristie Reighard
SBOE 5 Mary Binegar
SBOE 6 Chris Orban
SBOE 7 Rhonda Johnson
SBOE 8 Karen Lloyd
SBOE 11 Delores Ford

Oh Yes, We’re Social — Join the Conversation!

Updated September 17, 2024

Categories

Communications and Community Engagement
Education Support Professional
Higher Education Faculty
Higher Education Staff
Legislative Issues
Legislative Issues and Political Action
Local Leader
New Teacher
Non-educator
OEA Member
preK-12 Teacher
Retired Member
Student Member
Take Action

Public Sector Employment and Political Activism: Using Your Voice While Protecting Your Job

The First Amendment protects all citizens of the United States by limiting the government’s ability to abridge freedom of speech. However, when the government is also a person’s employer things can become a bit more complicated. The following are some resources and guidelines to keep in mind when engaging in political activity.

When performing job duties such as classroom instruction, transporting students, communicating with parents, coaching, etc., it is important to be aware that your conduct is considered as a representation of your employer. As such, these and other activities do not receive the same First Amendment protections enjoyed by the average citizen.

There are two resources that provide helpful guidance to those employed and licensed to work at Pre-K – 12 public education agencies. The first is the Licensure Code of Professional Conduct for Educators, which can be found here: https://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Teaching/Professional-Conduct/Licensure-Code-of-Professional-Conduct. The second is locally adopted school board policies, which are often found on individual district websites and can also be requested directly from the local Board of Education. While the Code of Conduct and adopted board policies mainly apply to the performance of professional tasks or when representing the employer within the community, it is important to remember that some expectations extend beyond the regular workday and workplace.

Social Media: Social media is about being social. Something may be shared with friends, or with privacy settings cranked to the max, but that doesn’t mean it can’t or won’t be shared beyond the intended audience without your knowledge and consent.

  • A good guideline for social media use is to always assume what is posted, liked, shared, or uploaded can be seen by everyone in the community. Keep your professional life separate from your personal (and political) life.
  • Don’t engage individuals who just want to argue, abuse, or name call. Block, unfriend, or even find a better platform for more meaningful dialogue.
  • Avoid using social media when frustrated and/or angry. It may seem like the perfect outlet for stress, but failure to consider your choice of words and content can have negative employment consequences.

Technology: Technology is paid for through public dollars and provided to public employees to assist them in their professional duties. Using the employer’s devices, Internet connection, software and/or platform for non-business-related purposes can result in discipline and termination.

  • Don’t use employer technology to access personal accounts, including social media, to engage in political activism. Make sure you have read and understand the acceptable use policy (AUP).
  • Don’t expose, present, or fail to prevent students from accessing inappropriate material. Not sure what counts as inappropriate? Check your employing board or campus adopted policies.

Engaging with Students, Colleagues, and the Community on Political Issues

As public education employees, most of your day is spent with students, colleagues, and community members.
Friendships, familiarity, and acquaintances are developed within the work environment. For Pre-K – 12 employees:

  • Don’t offer your political views to students or use one’s position to proselytize personal political beliefs.
  • Always make sure content, resources, and topics for instruction are developmentally appropriate and clearly connect to the academic standards for the grade level and topic.
  • If asked, don’t feel you must share your personal political beliefs. Reinforce they are personal and not connected to the day’s learning. For some, their motivation may be to goad, distract and/or cause trouble for the employee.
  • Even when communicating with adults, never use technology or make comments which share obscene material, promotion of violence, disparagement of students, or disparagement based upon gender, gender identity, race, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, military status, or religion.

Reference: Principle 9 Appropriate and Responsible Use of Technology Licensure Code of Professional Conduct for Educators

Also remember, if you are facing discipline, immediately contact your union representative, officer or OEA Labor Relations Consultant (LRC) before participating in any proceedings related to the accusation. Please see the Weingarten Rights page for more information on your rights during investigatory interviews: https://www.ohea.org/member-center/weingarten-rights/.

Categories

Local Leader
New Teacher
OEA Member
Student Member
Union Business

A Teacher’s Brain Following Yet Another School Shooting…and Yet Another Misguided Response by Legislators

By Julie Holderbaum, Minerva EA/OEA

binder and gun

Another school shooting? 19 students killed? And two teachers?

He bought the AR-15s legally, just days after his 18th birthday? And bought another weapon just a few days after buying the first, with a high-magazine clip? Doesn’t anyone besides me see that there should be a red flag in some system somewhere that signals local police to check this person out?

Would it have made a difference in this case? Maybe not…but we will never know, will we?

Is this for real? Is a local group really raffling off an assault rifle as a fundraiser for a youth program? Are they really asking kids to sell tickets for an assault weapon when kids were just slaughtered with the same type of gun, to the point of needing a DNA sample to be identified? I’m not sure if there is ever a right time for that sort of fundraiser, but less than a month after Uvalde?

And now the legislature passed what? A bill to LOWER the number of required training hours to 24 for teachers to carry a weapon in school? Didn’t my daughter need 50 hours of behind-the-wheel training just to get a driver’s license? Why would a teacher, who is not in the field of law enforcement, need so few hours of training to carry a gun in a school?

How would that even work? Would it be a hand gun? Locked and loaded in a drawer somewhere? Is a handgun going to be any deterrent to a person carrying an assault rifle? Would I have time to get to it if I needed it? And how would I know I needed it? A loud noise in the hall? Would I get my gun and peek my head out to see if action is needed? Would eight other teacher heads be peeking out in my hallway, guns drawn?

If nothing was wrong and we grabbed our weapons in error, would the students in our classes be traumatized by seeing their teachers with loaded guns?

Or has this lockdown-drill-school-shooting cycle become so normalized to them that they wouldn’t even be phased at seeing the same people who teach them their ABCs or pre-calc wielding a dangerous weapon? And if so, what does that mean for the future of our country?

And what if the threat wasn’t in the hallway, but in my classroom? One of my students? Even if I could get to my gun, would I have the ability to shoot one of MY kids? Knowing he suffers from depression and can’t use our school resource mental health counselor because of insurance issues? Knowing his past experience with abuse? Knowing that he has not felt seen or heard or loved at home in years?

Could I shoot that kid?

And if I did use my gun, even if I saved lives, could I live with myself? What would the repercussions of pulling that trigger have for my own mental health? Would I ever be able to look at my students the same way again? Would they ever be able to see me in the same way again?

What if I hesitated? What if more were hurt because I struggled to pull the trigger? How could I ever teach again? How could anyone trust me again? How many lawsuits would I face because I didn’t act fast enough?

If trained law enforcement officers hesitated to enter Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, what makes anyone think teachers would be comfortable entering a spray of gunfire and endangering themselves? Especially with only 24 hours of training?

pencil apple gunOn the other hand, how many lawsuits would there be if I leapt into action, misread a situation, and shot an innocent person?

If we were required to actually carry our guns with us at all times, could I ever concentrate enough to teach effectively? How can I teach my students that words can change the world, that literature can move souls, that the power of a well-turned phrase can penetrate the hardest of hearts… while carrying a gun?

How’s that for a mixed message? Words have power, but guns are faster? Is that what we want to teach?

Beyond sending mixed messages, could I ever teach without constantly worrying about my weapon? About who is looking at it oddly today, about turning my back on anyone, about helping one student at her desk while my gun is about 2 feet away from the hands of the student in the desk next to hers? Would I have to keep one hand on my weapon at all times? As a TEACHER?

Surely I wouldn’t be required to carry a gun, though, right? I already check my classroom door multiple times a day to be sure it’s still locked; I already weigh the options of teaching with my door shut and locked for safety from shooters to teaching with it open to allow for more airflow and safety from COVID; I already jump at every odd sound or unannounced lockdown; how much worse would it be if I knew multiple people in our building were carrying guns?

This legislation won’t just affect the mental health of our students, will it?

I’m so tired of hearing that “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun”; if that’s true, why were weapons not allowed at the recent NRA convention in Texas? How could a room full of good guys with guns be a threat? Shouldn’t that be the safest place in the world? Why aren’t more responsible gun owners fighting for universal background checks, for a raise to the age limit to buy certain guns, for red flag laws, for a required waiting period before possessing a gun after purchase?

With so many Americans in favor of at least some reform to gun laws, are legislators who refuse to advocate for safer gun laws just afraid of losing their jobs? Afraid that without the money of the NRA and other pro-gun lobbyists they won’t be able to fund a successful campaign? That they would lose their power, their position, their ability to provide for their families? But don’t those same legislators force educators to live with those fears every day, knowing that if we teach about racism or other sensitive topics in the wrong way, we could lose our jobs thanks to their laws?

If they think we can’t be trusted to discuss elements of America’s troubled past or the current events of the day in a responsible manner, why would they deem us responsible enough to carry a gun in school?

When will our politicians put people over power? When will they set aside pride to work with the other side? When will the safety of our communities take precedence over an election?

If the politicians currently in office aren’t willing to make changes, is the blood of the victims of the next shooting on their hands….or on ours?

If this isn’t the time to persist in our efforts to persuade responsible gun owners to join the cause, when is?

If this isn’t the time to promise our children that we will do more than pause to remember the victims and pray that this never happens again, when is?

If this isn’t the time to preserve the sanctity of our classrooms as places of learning, belonging, and growing, when is?

If this isn’t the time to pursue real action by promoting politicians who run on a platform of actual changes to the law, when is?

If this isn’t the time to protest, when is? Aren’t the protest signs true? “The power of the people is greater than the people in power?”

Isn’t the truest form of political protest voting out those who have made empty promises but not practical efforts at positive change?

How many days until November?

Categories

About Voices of Change
Education Support Professional
Education Support Professionals
Higher Education Faculty
Higher Education Staff
Local Leader
New Teacher
OEA Member
preK-12 Teacher
Student Member
Teaching

Ohio Education Association expresses disappointment in Gov. DeWine’s shortsighted decision to sign HB 583

After charter and voucher hawks snuck 11th hour amendments into legislation meant to address the substitute teacher shortage in Ohio’s public schools, Governor Mike DeWine had the opportunity to do the right thing and line-item veto those ridiculous changes. Unfortunately, Governor DeWine failed to act, and by signing House Bill 583 on Friday as presented to him, he has once again put the interests of the lobbyists clamoring for ever more money to be diverted to private and charter schools over the wellbeing of the 90 percent of Ohio children who attend public schools and Ohio’s taxpayers.

“The bill should have never made it to the governor’s desk with all of these sweetheart deals for underperforming charter school sponsors and wealthy families trying to create loopholes to have their children’s private school tuition funded by public dollars,” said Ohio Education Association (OEA) President Scott DiMauro. “The lawmakers who rammed those deals through took a bill that was meant to help Ohio’s public schools meet the challenges of this moment by giving them a tool to address staff shortages in the short term and created legislation that will hurt Ohio’s public schools instead.”

The version of House Bill 583 that originally passed in the Ohio House on March 30, 2022, was proposed to address that state’s substitute teacher shortage by increasing flexibility for districts to hire subs. Substitutes are typically required to have a four-year degree, but during the pandemic, the state legislature passed a temporary measure allowing anyone 18 or older with a high school diploma to seek a substitute teacher’s license. HB 583 extends that measure for another two years.

Unfortunately, some charter school interests, many of whom are for-profit entities, convinced legislators to add several controversial charter and voucher amendments during the Senate Primary and Secondary Education Committee on May 24, and that was the version of the bill that was ultimately sent to the Governor’s desk for his signature.

One amendment weakens the accountability of charter school sponsors by prohibiting the Ohio Department of Education (ODE) from assigning an overall sponsor rating of “ineffective” if the sponsor scored zero points on only one of the three evaluation criteria: academic performance, adherence to quality practices, and compliance with laws and administrative rules. “Previously, failing in any of those categories was enough to warrant an ‘ineffective’ rating. Now, under the newly signed legislation, the charter sponsors have to be extraordinarily subpar in multiple categories to raise a red flag. That’s wrong,” DiMauro said.

Another amendment funnels more tax dollars from Ohio’s public schools to wealthy families who could comfortably afford to send their children to private schools on their own. HB 583, as signed, allows just about any family who ever qualified for income-based vouchers to continue reaping the rewards of those tax dollars even when their financial situation dramatically improves.

“The governor knows these are bad deals for Ohio’s taxpayers, Ohio’s communities, and Ohio’s public schools. He signed the legislation anyway,” DiMauro said. “Shame on him.”

Categories

2022 Press Releases
Local Leader
New Teacher
OEA Member